Call Us for a Free Consultation (subject to qualification) 403-209-4988

Missed the Deadline by a Few Days? Alberta Court Allows Late Estate Support Claim

Estate litigation is full of deadlines, and missing one can create significant anxiety for anyone pursuing a claim.

But does a missed deadline automatically end a family maintenance and support claim?

The Alberta Court of Appeal addressed that question in Flanigan v. Kirkland Estate, 2024 ABCA 349. The decision provides important guidance for surviving spouses and Adult Interdependent Partners seeking support from an estate and confirms that a short delay will not necessarily prevent a claim from moving forward.

The Background

The case involved a surviving Adult Interdependent Partner who had been in a relationship with the deceased for more than two decades.

The deceased's will divided the residue of her estate among her children and did not provide for her partner.

Following the grant of probate, the surviving partner sought to bring a family maintenance and support claim under Alberta's Wills and Succession Act.

The challenge was timing.

The legislation generally requires such applications to be commenced within six months of the grant of probate. Although the application was sent to the court before the deadline expired, it was not formally filed until several days later.

The estate argued that the claim was out of time and should be dismissed.

Family Maintenance and Support Claims

Alberta law recognizes that certain family members may have a legitimate claim for support from a deceased person's estate.

These claims can arise when a will fails to make adequate provision for the proper maintenance and support of:

  • A surviving spouse;
  • An Adult Interdependent Partner; or
  • Other qualifying family members.

The purpose of the legislation is to balance two important principles:

  • A person's right to decide how their estate will be distributed; and
  • The need to ensure that close family members are not left without reasonable support.

Is the Six-Month Deadline Absolute?

Many people assume that once six months have passed after probate, a support claim is automatically barred.

The Court of Appeal confirmed that this is not necessarily the case.

While the legislation imposes a six-month limitation period, it also gives the court discretion to allow a late claim in certain circumstances, particularly where estate assets remain undistributed.

This means that missing the deadline does not automatically end the inquiry.

Instead, the court must decide whether permitting the late application would be fair in all the circumstances.

Factors the Court May Consider

The Court confirmed that several factors may be relevant when deciding whether to allow a late application.

These include:

  • The length of the delay;
  • The reason for the delay;
  • Whether the estate or beneficiaries suffered prejudice;
  • The status of estate administration;
  • Whether assets remain undistributed;
  • The circumstances of the applicant;
  • The circumstances of the beneficiaries; and
  • The apparent merits of the claim.

No single factor is determinative.

Instead, the court must look at the overall situation and decide whether allowing the claim is consistent with the purposes of the legislation.

Why the Appeal Succeeded

In this case, the delay was only six days.

The Court found several important facts supported allowing the application to proceed:

  • The application had been submitted to the court before the deadline.
  • Estate counsel had already received a copy of the application.
  • There was no meaningful prejudice to the beneficiaries.
  • Estate assets remained undistributed.
  • The claim appeared to have sufficient merit to justify consideration.

The Court concluded that the delay was largely technical and did not justify preventing the claim from being heard on its merits.

As a result, the application was allowed to proceed.

Prejudice Matters

A significant theme running through the decision is the concept of prejudice.

Courts are generally concerned about whether a delay creates real harm for the estate or its beneficiaries.

Examples of prejudice may include:

  • Assets being distributed before the claim is brought;
  • Evidence being lost;
  • Witnesses becoming unavailable; or
  • Beneficiaries making financial decisions in reliance on the apparent finality of the estate.

Where little or no prejudice exists, the court may be more willing to permit a late application.

Merits Still Matter

The Court also considered whether the claim appeared to have potential merit.

This does not mean the applicant needed to prove the entire case at the preliminary stage.

However, courts are less likely to extend deadlines for claims that appear weak or unsupported from the outset.

In this case, the applicant's age, financial circumstances, lengthy relationship with the deceased, and contributions to shared property all supported allowing the matter to move forward.

Practical Lessons for Alberta Families

Do Not Miss the Deadline If Possible

The safest course is always to commence a support claim within the prescribed limitation period.

Act Quickly If a Deadline Has Passed

Even if a deadline has been missed, it may still be possible to seek relief. Delay in addressing the problem can make matters worse.

Preserve Evidence

Keep records relating to financial dependency, cohabitation, support arrangements, and property contributions.

Communicate With the Estate

Evidence that the estate was aware of the claim before the deadline may become important if timing later becomes an issue.

Estate Administration Should Proceed Carefully

Personal representatives should remain alert to potential support claims before making final distributions.

The Bottom Line

Flanigan v. Kirkland Estate demonstrates that Alberta courts may allow a family maintenance and support claim to proceed even when a filing deadline has been missed. The court's focus is not simply on the number of days late, but on the reason for the delay, whether anyone has been prejudiced, whether estate assets remain available, and whether the claim deserves to be heard.

The decision is a reminder that estate disputes are often determined by practical realities rather than rigid technicalities alone.

MerGen Law is Here to Help You

At MerGen Law, we assist clients throughout Alberta with family maintenance and support claims, Adult Interdependent Partner disputes, estate litigation, estate administration, and will challenges. Whether you are bringing a claim against an estate or responding to one, we are here to help.

This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Individuals facing concerns about estate disputes and timelines should seek professional advice tailored to their specific circumstances.

Contact Us Today

MerGen Law LLP is committed to answering your questions without all the confusing legal jargon.

We'll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.

Menu