Call Us for a Free Consultation (subject to qualification) 403-209-4988

When a Will Contains Conflicting Instructions: Lessons from Estate of Larry Wayne Gall

One of the most common misconceptions about estate planning is that once a will is signed, its meaning is always clear. In reality, even professionally prepared wills can contain inconsistencies that create uncertainty, delay administration, and lead to costly disputes among family members.

A recent Alberta Court of King's Bench decision, Estate of Larry Wayne Gall, 2026 ABKB 54, demonstrates how a single conflicting clause can result in litigation and how courts determine a will-maker's true intentions when a will appears to say two different things.

The Family Dispute

Larry Wayne Gall's will give his spouse, Betty Ann Gall, a life interest in the family residence, allowing her to continue living there during her lifetime. They will also state that after her interest ended, the residence would be sold and the proceeds divided equally among the couple's eight grandchildren.

However, the same section of the will also include language suggesting the residence would form part of the residue of the estate, which would ultimately benefit the deceased's daughter, Wylene Buchert.

When Betty Ann Gall later renounced her life interest and the home was sold, approximately $397,000 in proceeds became the subject of a dispute. The Court had to determine whether those funds belonged to the grandchildren or were part of the residue payable to the daughter.

How Courts Interpret an Unclear Will

When interpreting a will, Alberta courts focus on one primary question:

What did the testator intend?

Courts do not read a single sentence in isolation. Instead, they consider the entire will, the surrounding circumstances, and, where permitted, evidence that helps identify the deceased's intentions.

In this case, the Court reviewed:

  • The wording of the entire will.
  • The drafting lawyer's notes and file records.
  • Earlier estate planning instructions.
  • Evidence regarding the deceased's intentions.

After examining the evidence, the Court concluded that the deceased intended the sale proceeds from the residence to be divided among the grandchildren.

A Drafting Error Changed Everything

One of the most significant pieces of evidence came from the lawyer who preppared for the will.

The drafting solicitor explained that the clause directing the residence into the residue of the estate had been mistakenly left in the document from an earlier precedent. The lawyer's file notes and instructions showed that the deceased intended the home to benefit his grandchildren following the termination of his spouse's life interest.

The Court accepted this evidence and exercised its authority under Alberta's Wills and Succession Act to rectify the will by removing the mistaken wording.

This is an important reminder that drafting errors can occur, and thorough review of estate planning documents is critical.

What Happens When a Life Interest Is Given Up?

The case also addressed an issue that many people have never encountered.

The surviving spouse did not wish to exercise her right to remain in the residence and formally renounced her life interest. One beneficiary argued that the grandchildren should still wait until her death before receiving their inheritance.

The Court disagreed.

It confirmed the legal principle that when a beneficiary disclaims a life interest, the next gift in line may take effect immediately unless the will clearly provides otherwise. In other words, giving up the life interest accelerated the grandchildren's entitlement to the sale proceeds.

Not Every Gift Can Always Be Paid

Many people assume that every gift listed in a will will automatically be paid.

However, estate administration does not work that way.

Debts, taxes, expenses, and administration costs must generally be addressed before beneficiaries receive their inheritances. If sufficient funds are not available, some gifts may need to be reduced through a process known as abatement.

In Gall Estate, once the residence proceeds were allocated to the grandchildren, there were not enough remaining assets to fully satisfy all of the cash gifts set out elsewhere in the will. As a result, those gifts had to be reduced.

Corporate Assets Are Not Estate Assets

The decision also highlights a common source of confusion for business owners.

The deceased owned shares in a corporation. Some parties argued that assets belonging to that corporation should be available to satisfy estate gifts and obligations.

The Court rejected that argument.

A corporation is a separate legal entity. While shares owned by the deceased may form part of the estate, the corporation's assets belong to the corporation itself, not directly to the shareholder.

For individuals who own businesses, farms, or holding companies, proper estate planning should clearly distinguish between:

  • Personal assets;
  • Corporate assets;
  • Corporate shares; and
  • Estate property.

Good Records Can Prevent Estate Disputes

Another practical lesson from the case involves documentation.

The Court required additional evidence regarding certain vehicles, investment accounts, ownership records, and beneficiary designations because the estate records were incomplete.

Maintaining organized records can significantly reduce disputes and help personal representatives administer estates more efficiently.

Important records often include:

  • Beneficiary designation forms;
  • Vehicle registrations;
  • Corporate documents;
  • Investment account information;
  • Property ownership records; and
  • Estate planning documents.

Practical Lessons for Alberta Families

The decision provides several valuable estate-planning lessons:

  • Review wills carefully for inconsistencies and drafting errors.
  • Ensure life-interest provisions clearly state what happens if the interest is renounced.
  • Keep beneficiary designations up to date.
  • Distinguish corporate assets from personal assets.
  • Maintain complete ownership and financial records.
  • Revisit estate plans regularly as circumstances change.

The Bottom Line

Estate of Larry Wayne Gall serves as a reminder that effective estate planning requires more than simply signing a will. A well-drafted estate plan should clearly reflect your intentions, coordinate with your other assets and beneficiary designations, and minimize the risk of future disputes.

MerGen Law is Here to Help You

At MerGen Law, we assist individuals and families throughout Alberta with estate planning, estate administration, and estate litigation matters. Taking the time to review your estate plan today can help ensure your wishes are carried out tomorrow.

This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Individuals facing concerns about a will's intent and instructions should seek professional advice tailored to their specific circumstances.

Contact Us Today

MerGen Law LLP is committed to answering your questions without all the confusing legal jargon.

We'll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.

Menu